 can host static websites without a need for a web server)
Can be accessed concurrently by multiple Amazon EC2 instances, allowing them to share data. So, if your code needs the files locally, the EFS would be a better choice. The table below shows a high level comparison of the different retrieval options. It’s a highly reliable and secure storage solution and a great option for creating large backups for data recovery. AWS EFS vs. 0125 per GB-month * 200 GB). Amazon FSx is billed with a combination of provisioned storage and provisioned throughput. Amazon S3 is more useful for extract transform load (ETL) data warehouse scenarios than for online or ad hoc queries. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Deploys in minutes, easily scalable, and extremely stable". S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. Amazon EFS provides a simple, scalable, fully managed, elastic file system. SFTP data upload and download: At $0. 1 (NFSv4) protocols. General purpose is suitable for most Lambda. EFS vs EBS Multi-Attach features. 90 per GB. 8. Depending on your needs, EFS offers two storage classes:. $ 0. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "A solution with good technical support that needs to improve its stability". After caching is enabled, there is a 5x improvement when serving static assets stored on Amazon EFS. Multipart upload: If you are old enough, you might remember using download managers like Internet Download Manager (IDM) to increase. To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. As per the title of this question, what are the practical differences between AWS EFS, EBS and S3? My understanding of each:. 0125 per GB-month * 200 GB). Virginia). AWS Storage Types. 08 = $3. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3: which is better? Base your decision on 54 verified in-depth peer reviews and ratings, pros & cons, pricing, support and more. It allows users to store and retrieve files. Lambda provides a comprehensive range of storage options to meet the needs of web application developers. AWS Transfer Family is a fully managed AWS service that could be leveraged to transfer files in and out of Amazon S3 or Amazon EFS over the following protocols: AWS Transfer Family supports up to. Configure a VPC gateway endpoint for Amazon S3 within the VPC. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). However, this is slow compared to relational databases and S3. S3 is a storage facility accessible any where. Data upload and download fee: $0. offers pay for the. The table below contains a few examples of the price per 1 ms associated with different memory sizes, for usage falling within the first pricing tier – for. 045, for Google it’s $0. Cloud Solutions. AWS EBS is only accessible in a single region, while multiple EFS instances can share files across multiple regions. At present the price for AWS Transfer Family for SFTP, FTPS, and FTP is the same for all protocols: Feature. To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. 005 / 1000) + (50 * 1024 *1024 MB / 16 MB S3 HEAD requests * $0. EFS is generally best for traditional file-based applications, while S3 is best for cloud-native applications. 8. AWS Snapshots: Storage Costs. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". For S3 Intelligent-Tiering, there is an additional charge of $0. 25c/GB) is replicated across the region, is instantly. ¥ 0. 9. The cost of FSx storage decreases with deduplication. 025$ per GB a month for standard storage and 0. Create file system. You can access your file system from the cloud (using Amazon EKS clusters or Amazon EC2 instances), or on-premises (via AWS VPN. 5% availability over a given year; Amazon S3 Glacier: Low-cost storage class ideal for data archiving; Data is not available for real-time access;. Now you are able to share the folders located on Amazon S3 as you would with any other Nextcloud folders. The first three items in the list above — ephemeral storage, elastic block storage and elastic file system. This means that even if you attach a dozen instances to it, you will pay the same price as if you simply attached one. The updates and changes will allow customers to leverage S3 and EFS more efficiently and cost-effectively. It barely beats a single io2 Block Express EBS volume (5GB/sec EFS vs. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?) Asked Apr 11 '15 at 08:43. There are multiple storage classes available in Amazon S3. In this article, you learned about comparing Amazon S3 vs RDS. HDFS: Extremely good at scale but is only performant with double or. EFS is effectively cheaper than EBS. The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. Depending on your needs, EFS offers two storage classes: Infrequent Access and Standard Access. Elastic File System (EFS). 5. Scaling AWS EFS does not disrupt applications. Share. Conclusion. At present the price for AWS Transfer Family for SFTP, FTPS, and FTP is the same for all protocols: Feature. You can use S3 Intelligent-Tiering as the default storage class for virtually any workload, especially data lakes, data analytics, new applications, and user-generated content. if you were to use 1 TB of EFS Standard Storage for 15 days and 200 GB of EFS Standard Storage for the remaining 16 days of a 31 day month, your total Standard Storage would be 1,000 GB * 15 days * 24 hours/day + 200 GB * 16 days + 24 hours / day =. Amazon offers two standard classes of file system storage in EFS: Standard and Infrequent Access storage class (EFS Standard-IA). , random access files for an RDBMS) or used by an. Security: AWS S3 buckets are usable on a permission-based level that is managed through the IAM policy of the AWS account. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Let's break it d. S3 organizes data in a hierarchy with metadata and it allows to run more complex queries on objects compared to EBS and EFS. The distributed design of Amazon EFS avoids the. 2 Use cases 3 Amazon EFS 3. That’s a significant difference that can add up quickly. 025 per GB per month. S3: Not limited to access from EC2 but S3 is not a file system. Amazon’s EFS service is fully elastic, meaning it grows and shrinks as files are added or removed. Other metrics, such as access frequency, can be opted into at a low cost. Total Cost of Ownership (1 year) $3,686. 2. At the time, I had at least one conversation daily (or so it seemed) about File Gateway or Amazon EFS being the right solution for NFS workloads. 01 per GB for data transfer in and $0. provides managed NFS (network file system) that can be. The AWS Elastic File System (EFS) is one of Amazon’s three primary storage solutions. Savings with Amazon EFS. The Takeaways. 04/GB, your monthly charge for data uploads and downloads over SFTP is: $0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud storage pricing varies depending on which of the three storage services you use—object storage (S3), block storage (EBS), or file storage (EFS). The main differences between EBS and EFS is that EBS is only accessible from a single EC2 instance in your particular AWS region, while EFS allows you to mount the file system across multiple regions and instances. 1 provides better performance for parallel small-file read operations (greater than 10,000 files per second) compared to NFSv4. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. For e. 023 per GB, making it fairly cheap compared to EBS and EFS. AWS EFS EFS is fairly easy to learn to use because it mirrors a traditional file hierarchy structure. The full form of Amazon EFS is Amazon Elastic File System. Launch EC2 instance. Azure Blob, you need to consider the type of business that you are running. 005 = $15 per month + 250 MB/s Throughput = 125MB/s free + 125 * $0. In 2016, File Gateway only supported NFS, and on the surface seemed to be. In terms of security, both AWS EFS and Azure File Storage offer robust security measures. SG still requires the other storage systems. 75* Cost of configuration items by AWS Config = 2000 x. Quickly learn Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. answered Nov 1,. Storage volumes can only connect to a single EC2 instance at a time, which enables quick file access. + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud storage pricing varies depending on which of the three storage services you use—object storage (S3), block storage (EBS), or file storage (EFS). In the world of cloud computing, storage plays a crucial role in managing and organizing data. Cost Considerations: Evaluate the cost implications of each service based on your storage and access patterns. AWS offers the same durability as S3 along with data querying options; Google cold. 20. AWS Data Storage Service Offerings. Amazon S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access: Like S3 Standard-IA, S3 One Zone-IA is for data that’s accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. 6, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 7. If you store more than 50 TB per month, the next 450 TB will be charged at $0. Continuous replication of data has the advantage of being the shortest. Keep in mind that each service has a different cost structure, and thus your choice of storage service impacts cost optimization in AWS. Select from object storage, file storage, and block storage services, backup, and data migration options to build the foundation of your cloud IT environment. These are the basic definitions. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. From this, you can see that for the same amount of storage space, gp3 is 20 percent more cost-effective than gp2 volumes. Using EFS Lifecycle Management, you can automatically move. Back in 2016, we first launched File Gateway, a gateway type of the hybrid cloud storage service AWS Storage Gateway. S3 Glacier Deep Archive: The lowest-cost storage class for long-term data archiving, with the longest retrieval times. 50 in storage charges for the snapshot archive in a 30-day month. 30 per GB-month; Infrequent access storage: $0. As for pricing, it gets a bit complicated (all prices are per GB/month), but for HHD, AWS starts at $0. You can also manage Amazon EFS client access using Amazon EFS resource policies, which are similar to bucket policies. For performance go for ebs , for cost go for s3. December 8, 2022 by Chris Contents hide 1 Amazon S3 1. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of. In your opinion, does it make sense to use Amazon EFS for database backup from a cost perspective? 2. I guess with S3 you have to use the SDK where as with EFS being a file system you can use standard I/O methods from your programming language of choice to create files. With EFS lifecycle management, you can move files that have not been accessed for the duration of the lifecycle policy (7, 14, 30, 60, or 90 days) to the IA storage classes. That's why it includes the 86400 calculation. 023/GB. 6, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is rated 8. In this example, the table above shows that Amazon EFS is less than half the cost of a self-managed cloud solution with third-party software. As already mentioned EFS is completely different to S3. Amazon S3. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of IOPS and latency. LifecyclePolicy. Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive: S3 Glacier Deep Archive is Amazon S3’s lowest-cost storage class that supports long-term. Updated: September 2023. 04/GB. 3/month. FAq for comparison s3 v/s ebs v/s efs. From your hard drive in the cloud to a shared collaboration space and a secure virtual attic for all your data. has a cost, so one should consider when and how many calls they make to a bucket. EBS is different from S3 in that it provides a storage volume directly connected to EC2 (Elastic Cloud Compute). The Difference Explained. Total cost of ownership may be higher, depending on your needs for the data being stored. Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) can host static websites without a need for a web server. 200 GB of this data resides in the EFS Standard storage class and 800 GB in the EFS Standard-IA storage class. Object Storage vs File System vs Block Storage. 043/GB-month, as long as you enable lifecycle management and 80% of the data is infrequently accessed. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is a cloud-based file storage service for applications and workloads that run in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) public cloud. Glacier’s use cases are far more targeted than S3’s, but this makes it a powerful solution for. 115 $ per GB per month for storage. Backup storage: 2,048 GB-months x $0. 741,611 professionals have used our research since 2012. 065 / IOPS / month: N/A: EFS:Enterprises typically compare EFS to S3 and EBS when they weigh their AWS storage options. The new S3 Infrequently Accessed allows you to reduce cloud costs further without sacrificing recovery time. You can also pay lucid directly 20 bucks per terabyte to store in wasabi. Objects in Amazon S3 are associated with a unique identifier (key), so access to them can be obtained through web requests from anywhere. However, choosing a storage option is not easy since each of them has unique features. In this article, we will discuss these storage solutions in detail along with their differences. 01 per GB transferred). There are several interesting aspects in terms of pricing. That represented a 61% saving by using EFS. It uses built-in lifecycle management to optimize between SSD-performance class and an infrequent access class that offer 92% lower cost. " What does this mean? Here block means file block in traditional sense or AWS specific blocks? What if I have 1GB data + 500MB data. Resolution. It is a scalable, cloud-based file system supporting Linux-based applications and workloads that can work in tandem with AWS cloud services and on-premise resources. Choosing between AWS S3 and EFS can be confusing. The same file from S3 (same region, with Gateway Endpoint) takes 5,100ms on average. 10 per GB for EBS), you have to pay once for each EFS file system. When should I use Amazon EFS vs. 8. Amazon S3? AWS offers cloud storage services to support a wide range of storage workloads. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is the only cloud. EBS: $0. AWS EFS may provide online content, retain multiple backups, and minimize storage costs. 20 per MBps per month. The storage cost of gp3 is on average 20% less than gp2 ($0. 065 per month. AWS Glue then allows seamless data movement between data lakes. Cuối cùng, Amazon S3 là một kho lưu trữ object rất hiệu quả trong việc lưu trữ số lượng lớn các bản sao lưu hoặc tệp người dùng. When the contents within your S3 bucket change, it'll automatically update the FSx file system to show these changes. In the end, the deciding factor between Amazon EBS vs. It is ideal if many services need to access the same data at the same time. 0004 per 1000 GET, SELECT, and other requests. 6 ms. Amazon EFS. Lower latency than S3; Highest cost of the three; Share. This has an approximately 13x multiple over S3 — costing $0. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. A. Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers various kinds of storage systems, and users can sometimes be confused about which one is the right choice for their cloud storage operation. Data deduplication doesn’t add any additional costs, so it’s a great way to help optimize and reduce your storage costs. 005 per-GB for data retrieved to your applications via the Lambda functions. The cost of using the AWS EFS Infrequent Access tier storage is drastically lower—$0. Choose the correct VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) and configuration that suits your use case. ”. 0065 per GB per month, while SSD storage cost reduces to $0. You can preserve the EC2…Amazon EC2 also has a variety of features that allows it to function better in conjunction with other AWS services. Block Storage with NetApp Cloud Solutions. You don’t even have to pay for files that are less accessible, and it can automatically expand when clients need more storage, and you don’t have to pay. S3 Intelligent-Tiering Storage, Frequent Access Tier. In this article, we explain what Amazon EBS is and how pricing is calculated to help you avoid overspending on your AWS bill. 10 in AWS, $0. S3's standard tier costs $0. Simple Storage Service – S3. 6. By choosing the right storage architecture, customers are empowered to quickly experiment and migrate to AWS. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage. 1/Month (depends on speed - SSD or not) + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. EFS is file system storage, using NFSv4 protocol. You choose a class depending on your use case. 1629 per GB. 021-0. The main advantage of EFS is it can be accessed from multiple EC2 instances. Securely and reliably access your files with a fully managed file system designed for 99. Cost-Effective Storage Options: The company’s game assets vary in terms. Backup storage is $0. For example, many small files, highly parallel writes or high write/read ratios. AWS DataSync is an online data transfer service that can copy data between Network File System (NFS), Server Message Block (SMB) file servers, self-managed object storage, and also between AWS services. g. 3. Let’s break it down and see where each shines. Logging and Monitoring in Amazon S3. Amazon EFS? Amazon EBS is the high-availability storage volume for EC2 instances at the block level. While EFS is more expensive than EBS ($0. 3c/GB) is replicated across the region and is instantly available; S3 Standard - Infrequent Access (1. Amazon EBS is much easier to use than Amazon S3 and EFS (Elastic File System) because its cause. 02 = $0. It would cost an additional $30 per month for the provisioned I/O, after accounting for the 5 Mbps of throughput -- at 50 Kbps per GB of. More detail about. In the AWS platform, cloud storage is primarily broken down into three services: Simple Storage Service (S3). Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides scalable network file systems for use with EC2 instances. EFS is a file system. 0 (less than 1,000 files per second). More than 700,000 data lakes run on AWS. Lets’ learn about the differences of Amazon EBS. AWS storage types across file, block and object-- including Simple Storage Service (S3), FSx, Elastic File System (EFS) and Elastic Block Store (EBS) -- vary sharply by features, management and performance. When enabled, lifecycle management migrates files that have not been accessed for a set period of time to the EFS Standard–Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) or One Zone–Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) storage class, depending on your file system. Options: A. So if i use AWS EFS or EBS there wont be any necessity for the API call to S3. If you turn on EFS Lifecycle Management then the effective cost can drop, but there are a lot of assumption in that price. 01 per gigabyte per month. Reference the S3 developer guide for technical details on Data Retrievals. 20/MBps-month = $18/month. . When you want to archive your data, S3 provides low cost archival services with Glacier classes where data can be stored for long periods of time in a cost-effective way. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. DOWNLOAD NOW. EBS stands for Elastic Block Store and is a block-level storage option for use with […]It's fully atomic, eventually consistent, higher latency than GlusterFS or even NFS. Its cost is lower then EFS. 1755 per GB. S3 is an object storage system, designed to provide archiving and data control options. It depends on your specific use-cases and softwares but here's some basic guideline. 01 per GB transferred). Cost-effective data storage is critical when building and scaling data lakes that manage and hold growing datasets. Firstly, let’s remind ourselves about S3 and EFS. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) Score 8. From: EBS vs EFS vs S3 - When to Use AWS’ Three Storage Solutions: "EBS is a block storage service, which means all data within EBS is stored in equally sized blocks. AWS Backup pricing is composed of two elements—storage costs and data transfer costs, and we’ll help you understand how to estimate and calculate your. S3 offers the option to store a virtually unlimited number of files in a bucket and you won’t ever run out of disk space. Many of these have been resolved over the last couple of. 1 protocols. However, Infrequent Access is generally used if you're storing data on EFS that is rarely accessed. However, for external storage, sharing files and folders is deactivated by default. Cost for IOPS: Cost for Throughput: S3: $0. While the maximum size of an EBS volume can be up to 16 TB, EFS volume sizes are practically unlimited. Amazon EFS Features. Amazon EFS Features. Amazon S3 offers a range of storage classes for the objects that you store. S3 does not support NFS. Example Scenario. 8. Regarding cost, Amazon S3 is no doubt the cheapest in terms of pure storage costs. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. The model is stored either in S3, ECR (via OCI deployment with Lambda), or EFS and is then used by a compute service such as Lambda. Data on S3 is served over HTTP (s) to your machines. Although all three use Amazon EC2 instances, they vary widely when it comes to parameters such as cost, performance, throughput, compute. Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides serverless, fully elastic file storage so that you can share file data without provisioning or managing storage capacity and performance. $0. 08/GB-month vs $0. EFS stands for Elastic File System and is a file-level storage option for use with AWS. Amazon Storage Services: EFS vs EBS vs S3. 999999999% (11 9s) of data durability and 99. This post on stack is also a good read AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?)The example is focused on costs directly related to EFS Replication. Amazon Simple Storage Service region -Requests-Tier2 : This is for GET. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. 8e+01k times 384. An example of Docker image using the S3 plugin is available in the GitHub repo. 3/Month. 30 for EFS. 6 ms. However, you should realize that payment is per EFS share and not per machine instance, so the cost of using EFS decreases the more machines you have. 05/GB-month = $102/month. EFS, and explore the differences in the storage types across management, cost, performance and uses. For example, moving a 100 GB tape archived in S3 Glacier to S3 Glacier Deep Archive will cost 100 GB x $0. S. 0. To use the EFS One Zone and One Zone–IA storage classes, you must create a file system that stores data redundantly within a single Availability Zone in an AWS Region. S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving and one of the best in the market today. For multiple small files, EFS performance might get degraded. Performance: AWS file storage solutions are optimized for performance and can deliver high throughput and low-latency access to data, making them ideal for. Media processing (for example video editing, sound design)—EFS provides high data consistency with high throughput and central, shared. 9 TB. Amazon EFS, on the other hand, is a fully-managed file storage service that is designed to provide scalable, shared access to files for multiple EC2 instances. Flexibility: AWS provides a range of file storage solutions, including AWS EFS, AWS FSx, Amazon S3 storage, and AWS EBS, which can be used to meet a wide variety of file storage use cases. The updates and changes will allow customers to leverage S3 and EFS more efficiently and cost-effectively. Find the perfect storage solution for your needs. 20. Write access performance between S3 and EFS follow a similar pattern to random file access at approx. EBS vs. S3 is a cost-effective solution for. With Amazon EFS, you can create a file system, mount the file system on an Amazon EC2 instance, and then read and write data to and from your file system. The capacity in this can be easily adjusted and no overhead management is needed. EBS: $0. Which is costlier EFS or EBS? Amazon EFS is almost 10 times more expensive than Amazon EBS pricing, but the cheaper Amazon EBS can only be accessed by one Amazon EC2 instance at a time. S3 is an object storage system, designed to provide archiving and data control options. Data downloads. Anything over 500 TB is charged at $0. AWS currently offers the following storage services: Instance/Ephemeral Storage. Seamlessly migrate, automate, and monitor your file transfer workflows into and out of Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS using the SFTP, FTPS, and FTP protocols. 999999999% (11 9’s) of durability. Amazon EBS is designed to store data in blocks (volumes of a provisioned size) attached to an Amazon EC2 instance, similar to a local disk drive on your physical machine. Amazon S3 is perhaps the most popular of all the AWS storage types. 1/Month: $0. Amazon's pricing assumes a savings of 50% and reduces the cost of HDD storage in the U. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. S3 Intelligent-Tiering for automatic cost savings for data with unknown or changing access patterns. Using EFS Lifecycle Management, you can automatically move files. Share. 017 $ per hour and an additional 0. Think of a computer’s hard drive. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. 99% as Amazon S3 Standard Storage, it has a much lower durability of 99. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is ranked 12th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews while Amazon S3 is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 53 reviews. Amazon FSx for Lustre makes it easy and cost effective to launch, run, and scale the world’s most popular high-performance file system. Answer – S3 is object storage and latency is higher than EBS and EFS we can host/install OS or application on it, EBS is block storage and it the default storage with Ec2 instance we can attach 1 EBS with 1 instance. Share. 99% availability making it a very good choice for users with critical applications. Cost Costs will increase in both EBS or EFS with increasing provisioned performance. Like S3, EFS has multiple storage classes. You can allocate any amount of memory to your function between 128 MB and 10,240 MB, in 1 MB increments. The default backup plan and backup vault cannot be deleted. There’s also the risk of ramping up significant costs — filesystem operations translate to S3 API requests which have a cost of $0. For more information about. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create file systems that are accessible to Amazon EC2 instances via a file system interface (using standard operating system file I/O APIs) and support full file. Simple Storage Service – S3. 021-0. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). It is ideal for workloads that require shared file access and supports NFSv4 and NFSv4. Two…For AWS US East (N. 005 USD per provisioned IOPS-month over 3,000. 30 for EFS. It’s easy to get confused with. Create an IAM user with an S3 access policy and copy the IAM credentials to the EC2 instance. , random access files for an RDBMS) or used by an. Entire data is stored in fixed-size blocks that have unique addresses. Adding the charges above, your total monthly bill for the AWS Transfer Family would be: $216 + $1. Amazon EFS simplifies scaling storage for you. To use the One Zone–IA storage class, you must enable. Let’s say that you temporarily restore the 200 GB snapshot from the archive tier for a period of 15 days. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 38 reviews. For performance, Amazon EBS is the fastest due to high IOPS, but when it comes to shared. Create a bucket policy to make the objects in the S3 bucket public. 1. To manage the process of creating the destination file system and keeping it synced with the source file system, Amazon EFS uses a replication. Like S3, EFS has multiple storage classes. As you can see in the table above, for the light use case, SFTP Gateway for AWS is 25-66% cheaper than AWS SFTP. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. S3 is an object storage system, designed to provide archiving and data control options.